🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

According to recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. How medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee making average wages must contribute approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast that with what average American pays. I can name dozens of businesses who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with funding medical services. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to much of our government's defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes required, would still be a better and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we take serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.